Search

Primary tabs

Search results

  1. WHORTON v. BOCKTING

    this testimony would violate the Confrontation Clause. He was convicted and sentenced to prison. On ... S. 36, holding that “testimonial statements of witnesses absent from trial” are ... the admission of testimonial hearsay statements made by an unavailable declarant. Pp. 8–9. ...

  2. COOPER v. HARRIS

    here, the evidence at trial—including live witness testimony subject to credibility ... District 12. And, in testimony that the District Court found credible, Congressman Mel Watt testified that ... testimony and a significant contradiction in his trial testimony. Finally, an expert report lent ...

  3. OHIO v. CLARK

    36, 54, held that the Confrontation Clause generally prohibits the introduction of “testimonial ... had a prior opportunity for cross-examination.” A statement qualifies as testimonial if the “primary ... purpose” of the conversation was to “creat[e] an out-of-court substitute for trial testimony.” Michigan v. ...

  4. Maryland v. Craig

    a judge to receive, by one-way closed circuit television, the testimony of an alleged child abuse victim ... upon determining that the child's courtroom testimony would result in the child's suffering ... and cross-examined; the judge, jury, and defendant remain in the courtroom, where the testimony is ...

  5. Harris v. New York

    attack the credibility of defendant's trial testimony. See Walder v. United States, 347 U.S. 62. Pp. ... two sales. A second officer verified collateral details of the sales, and a third offered testimony ... contradicted petitioner's direct testimony at trial. In response to the cross-examination, petitioner ...

  6. PENA-RODRIGUEZ v. COLORADO

    verdict, either by affidavit or live testimony. Some American jurisdictions adopted a more flexible version ... exception for juror testimony about racial bias in deliberations. Three Federal Courts of Appeals have also ... testimony: members of the venire can be examined for impartiality during voir dire; juror misconduct may be ...

  7. SCHRIRO v. LANDRIGAN

    refused to allow his counsel to present the testimony of his ex-wife and birth mother as mitigating ... mother’s testimony. On that record, the state court’s determination that Landrigan refused to ... from Wiggins v. Smith, 539 U. S. 510, that his last minute decision to block testimony could not excuse ...

  8. Communist Party of the United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd. No. 12

    A witness having been cross-examined at length following his direct testimony during the initial hearing, ... and the Board having stricken his testimony on two subjects about which recording of interviews with ... Board abused its discretion in refusing to strike all of his testimony because ill [p2] health prevented ...

  9. Communist Party of the United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd. No. 12

    A witness having been cross-examined at length following his direct testimony during the initial hearing, ... and the Board having stricken his testimony on two subjects about which recording of interviews with ... Board abused its discretion in refusing to strike all of his testimony because ill [p2] health prevented ...

  10. A Book Named "John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure" v. Attorney General of Massachusetts

    and appellant publisher intervened. Following a hearing, including expert testimony and other ... book in evidence and also, as allowed by the section, heard the testimony of experts [n2] and accepted ... that there was expert testimony, much of which was strained, to the effect that Memoirs is a structural ...

Pages