1. Home › Search › Site › proportionality › supct_node

Search

Primary tabs

Did you mean
proportionate

Search results

  1. RITA v. UNITED STATES

    conduct,” as well as “ proportionality in sentencing through a system that imposes appropriately ... example, that the goals of uniformity and proportionality often conflict. The commentary describes the ... outside-Guidelines sentence varies in proportion to the degree of the variance. See, e.g., United States v. Smith, ...

  2. MOLINA-MARTINEZ v. UNITED STATES

    different federal courts for similar criminal conduct,’ as well as ‘ proportionality in sentencing through ... 350. Uniformity and proportionality in sentencing are achieved, in part, by the Guidelines’ significant ...

  3. BECKLES v. UNITED STATES

    “ proportionality in sentencing through a system that imposes appropriately different sentences for criminal conduct ...

  4. United States v. Fordice

    505 U.S. 717 United States v. Fordice (No. 90-1205) Argued: Nov. 13, 1991 Decided: June 26, 1992___ ...

  5. JAMES WOOD, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM A. UNDERHILL AND ASCHEL H. GEROW, DEFENDANTS.

    which requires the most burning will require the greatest proportion of coal-dust; the exact proportion ... 'because no certain proportion for the mixture is pointed out, but only that such quantity of coal must be ... most burning will require the greatest quantity of coal-dust; the exact proportion cannot, therefore, ...

  6. GREAT NORTHERN RY. CO. v. SULLIVAN.

    being the sum of proportionals made respectively by the Canadian Pacific and the Great Northern, ... destination on the other. Each proportional necessarily was a part of the through rate and was capable of use ... and serve precisely as do agreed divisions of charges based on joint rates. A proportional differs ...

  7. Pulley v. Harris

    Federal District Court, again contending that he had been denied the comparative proportionality review ... that comparative proportionality review was constitutionally required. Held: 1. There is no merit to ... state decisional law entitles him to comparative proportionality review. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 ...

  8. Pulley v. Harris

    Federal District Court, again contending that he had been denied the comparative proportionality review ... that comparative proportionality review was constitutionally required. Held: 1. There is no merit to ... state decisional law entitles him to comparative proportionality review. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 ...

  9. NotFound

    their children that my wife may think proper, but in a greater proportion to Francis P. Holloway than ... any other of G. Holloway's children; to Elizabeth P. Bartlett in a greater proportion than any of ... Griffin's children, in equal proportion.' The devise to the County Court of Woodford was held void; and ...

  10. TYLER v. BOSTON.

    describe the same proportion in the combination,' and 'that the jury should understand the ... construction of the suggested substitution, to wit, naphtha for kerosene, as contemplating the same proportion ... of the other.' It charged further, that 'whether one compound of given proportions is ...

Pages