Search

Search results

1. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL CASUALTY COMPANY. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. The AMERICAN HOSPITAL AND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY.

   the remarks of Senator McCarran, 91 Cong.Rec. 1443, and Senator Ferguson, 91 Cong.Rec. 1481. ... statutes, the McCarran-Ferguson Act, 15 U.S.C. 1011 —1015, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1011—1015, ... portions of the McCarran-Ferguson Act are set forth in the margin. 2 An examination of that statute and its ...

2. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. TRAVELERS HEALTH ASSOCIATION.

   conferees, Senators McCarran, O'Mahoney, and Ferguson, repeatedly emphasized that the provision did not ... Court. Section 2(b) of the McCarran-Ferguson Act provides that '(T)he Federal Trade Commission Act, ... kind of regulation by state law Congress had in mind' in enacting the McCarran-Ferguson Act. 262 ...

3. STATE BOARD OF INSURANCE et al., Petitioners, v. TODD SHIPYARDS CORPORATION.

   McCarran-Ferguson Act, 59 Stat. 33, 15 U.S.C. 1011, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1011, which provided that the regulation and ... 1 Subsequently, by force of the McCarran-Ferguson Act, we upheld the continued taxation and regulation by the ... requirements of due process. Were the Osborn and Hoopeston cases and the bare bones of the McCarran-Ferguson ...

4. ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Petitioners, v. David M. BARRY et al.

   the McCarran-Ferguson Act was granted by the District Court. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding ... McCarran-Ferguson Act support the proposed limitation on the reach of § 3(b). Section 3(b) is an exception to ... was barred by the McCarran-Ferguson Act, § 1 (Act), 59 Stat. 33, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 1011-101 ...

5. GROUP LIFE & HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANY, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. ROYAL DRUG COMPANY, etc., et al.

   the antitrust laws under § 2(b) of the McCarran-Ferguson Act (Act), because the agreements are the ... McCarran-Ferguson Act, 59 Stat. 34, as amended, 61 Stat. 448, 15 U.S.C. 1012(b), because the agreements are the ... the McCarran-Ferguson Act. If that conclusion is correct, then the Agreements are not exempt from ...

6. PRUDENTIAL INS. CO. v. BENJAMIN, Insurance Com'r of South Carolina.

   maintains that the tax is valid, more particularly in view of the McCarran Act, 5 by which it is claimed ... South Carolina's is one. Moreover, those results must follow regardless of the McCarran Act's ... McCarran Act to one side, either as not intended to have effect toward validating this sort of tax or, if ...

7. Charles ROWOLDT, Petitioner, v. J. D. PERFETTO, Acting Officer in Charge, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Department of Justice, St. Paul, Minnesota.

   sponsor, Senator McCarran, and his legislative collaborator, Senator Ferguson. See 97 Cong.Rec. 2368 and ... obtain work? Would such a man be excluded?' 97 Cong.Rec. 2369. And Senator McCarran, the chief ... described by Senator McCarran, consisted of 'aliens who were forced to become members of totalitarian ...

8. Hubert L. WILL, Judge, United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Petitioner, v. CALVERT FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

   federal proceedings was "the clear federal policy," evinced by the McCarran Amendment, of ... any event, § 2(b) of the McCarran-Ferguson Act, 15 U.S.C. 1012(b) (1976 ed.), exempted insurance from ...

9. Scales v. United States

   in the body of an omnibus measure, the McCarran bill. S. 4037, 81st Cong., 2d Sess. When this bill ...