 |
UNITED STATES V. BAJAKAJIAN, 524 U.S. 321 (1998) [Syllabus]
|
 |
LIBRETTI V. UNITED STATES, 516 U.S. 29 (1995). [Syllabus]
|
 |
UNITED STATES V. 92 BUENA VISTA AVE., 507 U.S. 111 (1993). [Syllabus]
|
 |
AUSTIN V. UNITED STATES, 509 U.S. 602 (1993). [Syllabus]
|
 |
UNITED STATES V. URSERY, 518 U.S. 267 (1996). [Syllabus]
|
 |
ALEXANDER V. UNITED STATES, 509 U.S. 544 (1993). [Syllabus]
|
 |
UNITED STATES JAMES DANIEL GOOD REAL PROPERTY, 510 U.S. 43 (1993). [Syllabus]
|
 |
REPUBLIC NAT'L BANK OF MIAMI V. UNITED STATES, 506 U.S. 80 (1992). [Syllabus]
|
 |
UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF AMERICA V. WARD [Syllabus]
|
 |
ESTATE OF COWART V. NICKLOS DRILLING, 505 U.S. 469 (1992). [Syllabus]
|
 |
DEGEN V. UNITED STATES, 517 U.S. 820 (1996). [Syllabus]
|
 |
FLORIDA V. WHITE [Syllabus]
|
 |
BENNIS V. MICHIGAN, 517 U.S. 1163 (1996) [Syllabus]
|
 |
UNITED STATES V. OLANO, 507 U.S. 725 (1993). [Syllabus]
|
 |
DUSENBERY V. UNITED STATES [Syllabus]
The Government's sending of notice by certified mail of a cash forfeiture to petitioner's place of incarceration satisfied his due process rights. |
 |
MARRAMA V. CITIZENS BANK OF MASS. [Syllabus]
|
 |
CLINTON V. GOLDSMITH [Syllabus]
|
 |
BOWLES V. RUSSELL [Syllabus]
|
 |
DAVIS V. WASHINGTON [Syllabus]
|
 |
ROE V. FLORES-ORTEGA [Syllabus]
Whether trial counsel has a Sixth Amendment duty to file a notice of appeal following a guilty plea in the absence a request by the defendant, particularly where the defendant has been advised of his appeal rights. |
 |
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INS. V. DARDEN, 503 U.S. 318 (1992). [Syllabus]
|
 |
JOHNSON V. UNITED STATES, 520 U.S. 461 (1997). [Syllabus]
|
 |
ROPER V. SIMMONS [Syllabus]
|
 |
SMITH V. UNITED STATES, 508 U.S. 223 (1993). [Syllabus]
|
 |
ALI V. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS [Syllabus]
|
 |
WATSON V. UNITED STATES [Syllabus]
|
 |
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBANDEVELOPMENT V. RUCKER [Syllabus]
Title 42 U. S. C. §1437d(l)(6)'s plain language unambiguously requires public housing lease terms that give local authorities the discretion to terminate the lease of a tenant when a member of the tenant's household or a guest engages in drug-related activity, regardless of whether the tenant knew, or should have known, of that activity. |