 |
JAMA V. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
[Syllabus]
|
|
JAMA V. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
[Syllabus]
|
 |
UNITED STATES V. HAGGAR APPAREL CO.
[Syllabus]
|
|
ALI V. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
[Syllabus]
|
|
UNITED STATES V. MEAD CORP.
[Syllabus]
A Customs ruling letter has no claim to deference under Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U. S. 837, but, under Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U. S. 134, it is eligible to claim respect according to its persuasiveness. |
 |
CLARK V. MARTINEZ
[Syllabus]
|
|
UNITED STATES V. UNITED STATES SHOE CORP., 523 U.S. 360 (1998)
[Syllabus]
|
 |
CHANDLER V. MILLER, 520 U.S. 305 (1997)
[Syllabus]
|
|
UNITED STATES V. BAJAKAJIAN, 524 U.S. 321 (1998)
[Syllabus]
|
 |
UNITED STATES V. RESSAM
[Syllabus]
|
|
WILL V. HALLOCK
[Syllabus]
|
 |
UNITED STATES V. 92 BUENA VISTA AVE., 507 U.S. 111 (1993).
[Syllabus]
|
 |
PASQUANTINO V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
|
|
[Syllabus]
|
|
ITEL CONTAINERS INT'L V. HUDDLESTON, 507 U.S. 60 (1993).
[Syllabus]
|
|
DICKINSON V. ZURKO
[Syllabus]
|
|
IDAHO V. COEUR D'ALENE TRIBE OF IDAHO, 117 S.CT. 2028, 138 L.ED.2D 438 (1997).
[Syllabus]
|
|
UNITED STATES V. FLORES-MONTANO
[Syllabus]
Whether, under the 4th Amendment, customs officers at the international border must have reasonable suspicion in order to remove, disassemble, and search a vehicle's gas tank for contraband? |
|
KIMBROUGH V. UNITED STATES
[Syllabus]
|
|
QUALITY KING DISTRIBUTORS, INC. V. LANZA RESEARCH INT., 523 U.S. 135 (1998)
[Syllabus]
|
