1. Home › Search › Site › counsel › supct_node

Search

Primary tabs

Search results

  1. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY, Plff. in Err. v. STATE OF FLORIDA upon the Relation of W. H. ELLIS, as Attorney General of Said State, and J. M. Barrs, as Special Counsel for Jefferson B. Browne et al., Railroad Commissioners of Said State.

    as Special Counsel for Jefferson B. Browne et al., Railroad Commissioners of Said State. No. 9. ... Mr. John E. Hartridge for plaintiff in error. Argument of Counsel from pages 258-259 intentionally ...

  2. Philip Q. ZAUDERER, Appellant v. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF the SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.

    DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL OF the SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. No. 83-2166. Argued: Jan. 7, 1985. Decided: May 28, 1985. ... clients." This advertisement attracted 106 clients. Appellee Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme ... Charles Kettlewell, an attorney employed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of ...

  3. KINGSLEY BOOKS, Inc., Louis Finkelstein, Doing Business as Times Book Shop, et al., Appellants, v. Peter Campbell BROWN, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York.

    Business as Times Book Shop, et al., Appellants, v. Peter Campbell BROWN, Corporation Counsel of the City ... '1. The chief executive officer of any city, town or village or the corporation counsel, or if there ...

  4. CITY OF DETROIT, William C. Maybury, Mayor, and Charles Flowers, Corporation Counsel,, v. DETROIT CITIZENS' STREET RAILWAY COMPANY.

    Flowers, Corporation Counsel, Appts., v. DETROIT CITIZENS' STREET RAILWAY COMPANY. No. 152. Argued: ... demanding the reduced rates for transportation. The mayor and corporation counsel have, as is seen, been ... arguments of counsel for the defendants upon the case of Georgia R. & Bkg. Co. v. Smith, 128 U. S. 174, ...

  5. LAFLER v. COOPER

    that counsel had provided deficient performance by advising respondent of an incorrect legal rule, and ... offered in the plea. Held: 1. Where counsel’s ineffective advice led to an offer’s rejection, and where ... (a) Because the parties agree that counsel’s performance was deficient, the only question is how to apply ...

  6. Docket no. 16-1140

    e.g., Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court of Ohio, 471 U. S. 626, 651, and where ... Christian belief-based) organizations that offer a limited range of free pregnancy options, counseling, and ... sonograms, or prenatal care to pregnant women. “(2) The facility provides, or offers counseling about, ...

  7. Buckley v. Valeo

    424 U.S. 1 Buckley v. Valeo (No. 75-436) Argued: November 10, 1975 Decided: January 30, 1976 [*] No. 75-36, 171 U.S.App.D.C. 172, 519 F.2d 821, affirmed in part and reversed in part; No. 75-437, 401 F.Supp. 1235, affirmed. ...

  8. Buckley v. Valeo

    424 U.S. 1 Buckley v. Valeo (No. 75-436) Argued: November 10, 1975 Decided: January 30, 1976 [*] No. 75-36, 171 U.S.App.D.C. 172, 519 F.2d 821, affirmed in part and reversed in part; No. 75-437, 401 F.Supp. 1235, affirmed. ...

  9. Buckley v. Valeo

    424 U.S. 1 Buckley v. Valeo (No. 75-436) Argued: November 10, 1975 Decided: January 30, 1976 [*] No. 75-36, 171 U.S.App.D.C. 172, 519 F.2d 821, affirmed in part and reversed in part; No. 75-437, 401 F.Supp. 1235, affirmed. ...

  10. Buckley v. Valeo

    424 U.S. 1 Buckley v. Valeo (No. 75-436) Argued: November 10, 1975 Decided: January 30, 1976 [*] No. 75-36, 171 U.S.App.D.C. 172, 519 F.2d 821, affirmed in part and reversed in part; No. 75-437, 401 F.Supp. 1235, affirmed. ...

Pages