1. Home › Search › Site › animals › supct_node

Search

Primary tabs

Did you mean
minimal

Search results

  1. PITTSBURGH MELTING CO. v. TOTTEN, Inspector of Bureau of Animal Industry.

    Animal Industry. No. 28. Argued: April 22, 1918. Decided: Nov. 4, 1918. opinion, DAY [HTML] Messrs. ... the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company and G. E. Totten, Inspector of the Bureau of Animal Industry ... elaborate system of inspection of animals before slaughter, and of carcasses after slaughter and of ...

  2. ANIMAL SCIENCE PRODUCTS, INC.

    Syllabus ANIMAL SCIENCE PRODUCTS, INC. v. () 837 F. 3d 175, vacated and remanded. Syllabus [HTML] ... COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus Animal Science Products, Inc., et al. v. Hebei Welcome ... UNITED STATES_________________ No. 16–1220_________________ ANIMAL SCIENCE PRODUCTS, INC., et al., ...

  3. LAMPS PLUS, v. VARELA

    arbitration, but the Ninth Circuit affirmed. This Court had held in Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l ... according to their terms. See 9 U. S. C. §2. In Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp., 559 U. S. ... control.’ ” Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp., 559 U. S. 662, 682 (2010) (quoting Mitsubishi ...

  4. Slaughterhouse Cases

    intended for sale or slaughter, within those limits, and requiring that all cattle and other animals ... for each animal landed, and certain prescribed fees for each animal slaughtered, besides the head, ... not be lawful to land, keep, or slaughter any cattle, beeves, calves, sheep, swine, or other animals ...

  5. Slaughterhouse Cases

    intended for sale or slaughter, within those limits, and requiring that all cattle and other animals ... for each animal landed, and certain prescribed fees for each animal slaughtered, besides the head, ... not be lawful to land, keep, or slaughter any cattle, beeves, calves, sheep, swine, or other animals ...

  6. Slaughterhouse Cases

    intended for sale or slaughter, within those limits, and requiring that all cattle and other animals ... for each animal landed, and certain prescribed fees for each animal slaughtered, besides the head, ... not be lawful to land, keep, or slaughter any cattle, beeves, calves, sheep, swine, or other animals ...

  7. OXFORD HEALTH PLANS LLC v. SUTTER

    and the Third Circuit affirmed. After this Court decided Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l ... au-thorized them. See Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp., 559 U. S. 662, 684 (2010). In this case, ... S. A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp., 559 U. S. 662, 685 (2010). With no reason to think that the absent ...

  8. AMERICAN EXPRESS CO. v. ITALIAN COLORS

    remanded in light of Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds International Corp., 559 U. S. 662, which held that ... judgment, and remanded for further consideration in light of Stolt-Nielsen S. A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp., ...

  9. BG GROUP v. REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA

    S. A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp., 559 U. S. 662, 671 (2010) (providing that it is only when an ...

  10. MORRILL, Collector, etc., v. JONES.

    1883 Section 2505 of the Revised Statutes provides, among other things, that 'animals, alive, ... animals free he must, among other things, 'be satisfied that the animals are of superior stock, ... animals, which were entered at the port of Portland, Maine, and claimed that they should be admitted free, ...

Pages