skip navigation


Spence v. Washington (No. 72-1690)
___
Syllabus

Opinion
[ ]
Concurrence
[ Douglas ]
Dissent
[ Burger ]
Dissent
[ Rehnquist ]
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version
HTML version
PDF version

BURGER, C.J., Dissenting Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES


418 U.S. 405

Spence v. Washington

APPEAL FROM SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON


No. 72-1690 Argued: January 9, 1974 --- Decided: June 25, 1974

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER, dissenting.

If the constitutional role of this Court were to strike down unwise laws or restrict unwise application of some laws, I could agree with the result reached by the Court. That is not our function, however, and it should be left to each State and ultimately the common sense of its people to decide how the flag, as a symbol of national unity, should be protected.